The Invention of Walter Pater

Abstract

Finds both books extending the serious study of Pater begun in the 1950s. Considers Levey’s work disappointing, however, because he fails to deal with Pater’s intellectual life and artistic development, and because he speculates too freely about Pater’s life and motivations. By contrast, Monsman offers a sound analysis of Pater’s intellectual development and works out his argument carefully while avoiding excessive speculation.